English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 889/889 (100%)
Visitors : 14777115      Online Users : 49
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ccur.lib.ccu.edu.tw/handle/A095B0000Q/844

    Title: 受刑人假釋救濟制度之研究;A Study on the Parole Relief System of Inmates
    Authors: 李宗融;LI, TSUNG-JUNG
    Contributors: 法律學系碩士在職專班
    Keywords: 假釋;假釋准否;行政訴訟救濟;Parole;Parole deny;Administrative litigation relief
    Date: 2017
    Issue Date: 2019-07-17 10:52:04 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 法律學系碩士在職專班
    Abstract: 本論文共區分六章,第一章闡明研究機動、目的、範圍及方法等項,第二章簡介我國假釋決定要件之沿革與現況及運作方式及實質要件「悛悔實據」認定之困境,藉此瞭解假釋決定制度的概觀,並釐清受刑人享有權益,始得接續探討其相對應之救濟方式,第三章針對大法官會議解釋前,假釋制度所產生之問題進行分析,如假釋定性不明、假釋否准決定違反正當法律程序及其救濟程序不明等,第四章針對釋字第681號及第691號進行評析,並概述大法官解釋解決之假釋問題,第五章經大法官解釋後,實務操作上衍生之問題,且針現行實務困境,預擬相關解決方案,第六章綜合上開各章所得論理,提出本文之結論,另釋字第681號後,立法院對於刑法第77條第1項僅提出一次法律修正案,且僅決議交由司法及法制委員會審查,即不復見相關修正案,爰於本文提出修法建議。
    This paper is divided into six chapters, the first chapter to clarify the research maneuver, purpose, scope and methods.The second chapter introduces the evolution and status quo of the parole determinants,the difficulties in determining the mode of operation and essential elements of the parole,and the difficulties in the determination of the parole,according to which the first chapter expounds the study of maneuver,purpose,scope and method. This chapter provides an overview of the parole decision system and clarifies the rights and interests of the inmates.The third chapter explains the interpretation of the parole decision.The author analyzes the problems arising from the parole system,such as the ambiguous nature of the parole,the parole decision on the violation of due process of law and the uncertainty of the relief procedure.Chapter 4 deals with the interpretation of Interpretation No. 681 and No. 691, and outlines the probation of parole explained and resolved by the Judge. Chapter 5, after interpretation by the Judge, is a matter of practical operation related solutions.The sixth chapter on the opening of the chapters on the theory,put forward the conclusions of this article,another release word No.681.The Legislative Yuan made only one amendment to law 77 (1) of the Penal Code,and only the resolution was referred to the Judicial and Legal Committee for review,that is,the relevant amendments were not repeated.
    Appears in Collections:[法律系研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat

    All items in CCUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    版權聲明 © 國立中正大學圖書館網頁內容著作權屬國立中正大學圖書館


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback