English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 888/888 (100%)
Visitors : 13123450      Online Users : 215
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ccur.lib.ccu.edu.tw/handle/A095B0000Q/836


    Title: 法律保留下的監獄行刑 — 轉向規範論的秩序探求;When the principle of legal reservation (Gesetzesvorbehaltprinzip) apply to Correction Execution Law: Turn on the order based on Normativism
    Authors: 黃文農;HUANG, WEN-NUNG
    Contributors: 法律學系碩士在職專班
    Keywords: 規範論;具體秩序論;懲戒罰;累進處遇;監獄秩序;法律保留;Concrete-Order Thinking;Rule and Statute Thinking;Disciplinary sanctions;The order of prison;Progressive treatment;The principle of legal reservation
    Date: 2017
    Issue Date: 2019-07-17 10:52:01 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 法律學系碩士在職專班
    Abstract: 矯正機關法制過去長期受德國公法學說「特別權力關係」理論所影響,因而法秩序存有其特殊性。本研究探討現行監獄秩序主要維持制度「懲罰」及「累進處遇制度」之缺陷,以歷史研究法,考察19世紀末至20世紀初,我國法制如何繼受相關外國法,以及後續變遷和衍生之問題。另外,本研究以20世紀德國重要法學家Carl Schmitt對於法學思維之區分,以界定我國現行監獄法令之狀態,以及應該確立改革的法制目標—從「具體秩序」轉變為「規範論」。結論上,本研究透過觀察制度的歷史變遷、比較法及相關法學理論之探討,以釐清現行監獄制度的法律問題,並借鑑外國立法例,初步草擬取代現行秩序管制制度之規範,及提出相關配套措施。最後,自法律之「適用論」及「立法論」分別提出對案,說明廢除累進處遇制度,在法律層面的逐步解決方式。
    The organizations of correction have been influenced by the theory of special power relationship (Das besondere Gewaltverhaltnis),which from the theory of Germany public law for a long time, so that legal order has its particular characteristics. The study aims to scrutinize the penalty, which keep the system work, and the drawback of Progressive Corrective Treatment (Measures). From late 19 century to early 20 century, how the laws in Taiwan had been transformed and changed by foreign relevant laws and regulations was discussed in the study. In addition, I used the viewpoints “the distinction among legal thinking”of Germany vital jurist “Carl Schmitt” to define the status of current Correction Execution Law. The goals of improving laws should be targeted to transform from “Concrete-Order Thinking” to “Rule and Statute Thinking”.In conclusion, the study aims to obsterve the historical change of the system, comparative law (Rechtsvergleichung), and relevant theories of law to clarify the law issues in the institutions of correction organizations and take foreign legislative as examples to reconstruct new regulations of social order in the prison and offer policies to put it into practice. Finally, the study suggests that Progressive Corrective Treatment should be abolished gradually from the perspective of “Application of Law” and “Legislation fo Law”.
    Appears in Collections:[法律系研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML391View/Open


    All items in CCUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    版權聲明 © 國立中正大學圖書館網頁內容著作權屬國立中正大學圖書館

    隱私權及資訊安全政策

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback