English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 888/888 (100%)
Visitors : 13009172      Online Users : 432
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ccur.lib.ccu.edu.tw/handle/A095B0000Q/749


    Title: 勞資爭議獨任調解人調解機制之探討;A Study on the Mediation Mechanism for Labor Dispute Sole Mediators
    Authors: 王明欣;WANG, MING-HSIN
    Contributors: 勞工關係學系碩士在職專班
    Keywords: 獨任調解人;調解人;勞資爭議;the sole mediators;mediators;labor disputes
    Date: 2017
    Issue Date: 2019-07-17 10:46:04 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 勞工關係學系碩士在職專班
    Abstract: 我國勞資爭議調解制度,在國民政府於1928年6月9日所公佈之勞資爭議處理法,從制定公布以來,到現在已經有7次的修正,但是大致上勞資爭議的處理架構並未有重大的改革。該法為我國之政府機關,也就是勞工主管機關在處理勞資爭議糾紛的重要程序,也就是現在的勞資爭議處理,以及維持勞雇合諧中的重要依據,而勞資爭議處理法之「調解」係指在爭議事件發生後,當事人無法自行解決,而依該法向勞工工作所在地的縣(市)政府,勞工主管機關申請調解,由中立的第三方協助雙方達成可以接受的方案。   早期也就是20年前的1975年初才2,200件左右,到1995年的8,000件,到2014年達到22,700件之多,已經超過政府機關人力的極限。因此陸續有民間的協會加入調解,但是也無法消化日益增多之調解案件。在2009年7月1日勞資爭議處理法修正公布全文60條;施行日期為2011年5月1日施行。自此走入獨任調解人制度,而獨任調解人和調解委員不同之處主要在於:進行調解工作的人數差異。  勞資爭議獨任調解人:除了擔任會議主席;並且也是勞資雙方的調解人,一人獨自全攬全場的調解過程,肩負著勞資爭議調解的成敗,可謂任務重大,由此亦可見獨任調解人的重要性。  本研究是針對獨任調解人調解機制之探討,研究過程中有一些限制:如不能直接訪談案件之當事人,又不能公布訪談對象之姓名,因為有個資法及隱私的問題!因此必須在條件很差的情況下,進行獨任調解人在處理爭議案件,所遇到的情形加以分析、研究解決之道。因此本研究有其價值觀和實用型,希望本研究能夠提供「獨任調解人」在調解時所碰到的情形加以排除和應對,使得能夠順利進行勞資爭議調解以嘉惠勞資雙方之合諧。本研究的結論與建議也提出:中央主管機關勞動部可以建立網路平台,使全國400多位獨任調解人可以有一個討論的平台。如果法令有修正時,可以在平台上即時公佈,藉此達到獨任調解人能迅速了解法令修正之內容,使得調解爭議時更加順暢。
    In accordance with labor dispute processing system in our country, there are seven revises from the formulate date of publication on June 9, 1928. Despite this, there are no major changes in labor disputes processing. Since then the Labor Dispute Act has become an important basis for handling labor disputes and bring workers and employers all into harmony. They applied for mediation from labor working of the county and city government if the parties can’t resolve the dispute on their own .The governments as an impartial third party assist the parties in reaching an acceptable solution. This study focused on the mediation mechanism for labor disputes sole mediators, emphasizing on a sole mediator facing many kinds of situations while in the coordination process, discussing the mediation how to work. There are eight sole mediator were interviewed, three from New Taipei City, three from Taichung City, two from Tainan City. All process and data are following Personal Information Protection Act. Finally, there are some recommendations below. The central competent authority should build an online platform, which can make good use of discussing room by 400 sole mediators. Any amended law can make public as soon as possible on it. Therefore, sole mediators can deal with those labor disputes smooth.
    Appears in Collections:[勞工關係學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML362View/Open


    All items in CCUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    版權聲明 © 國立中正大學圖書館網頁內容著作權屬國立中正大學圖書館

    隱私權及資訊安全政策

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback